Suzuki Baleno 2016 vs Toyota Auris 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 112 HP | 90 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 170 NM | 128 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 12.3 seconds | 10 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 4.7 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Suzuki Baleno petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Auris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Baleno is 29 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1085 litres | no data | |
| Suzuki Baleno has 5 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`418 | ~ 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |