Suzuki Alto 2009 vs Toyota Aygo 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Alto and Toyota Aygo have the same engine power, but Suzuki Alto torque is 3 NM less than Toyota Aygo. Suzuki Alto reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Alto consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Alto could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Alto consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Alto engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Agila, Suzuki Splash | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2009 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Alto is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 129 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Suzuki Alto has 10 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. This could mean that the Suzuki Alto uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`250 | 1`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |