Suzuki Alto 2009 vs Citroen C1 2008

 
Suzuki Alto
2009 - 2014
Citroen C1
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 68 HP68 HP
Torque: 90 NM93 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds13.7 seconds
Citroen C1 is a more dynamic driving.
Suzuki Alto and Citroen C1 have the same engine power, but Suzuki Alto torque is 3 NM less than Citroen C1. Suzuki Alto reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km5.1 l/100km
The Citroen C1 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Suzuki Alto consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C1, which means that by driving the Suzuki Alto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Alto consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C1.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway870 km on highway
640 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Alto engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 12 years20 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Agila, Suzuki SplashInstalled on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C1 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.50 m3.44 m
Width: 1.60 m1.66 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Suzuki Alto is 7 cm longer than the Citroen C1, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 129 litres139 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
774 litres751 litres
Despite its longer length, Suzuki Alto has 10 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C1. This could mean that the Suzuki Alto uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Alto (by 23 litres).
Turning diameter: 9 meters9.5 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen C1, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2501`190
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 28002200
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Alto has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
Citroen C1 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv