Suzuki Alto 2009 vs Chevrolet Spark 2013

 
Suzuki Alto
2009 - 2014
Chevrolet Spark
2013 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 68 HP68 HP
Torque: 90 NM93 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds15.5 seconds
Suzuki Alto and Chevrolet Spark have the same engine power, but Suzuki Alto torque is 3 NM less than Chevrolet Spark. Suzuki Alto reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.45.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km5.9 l/100km
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki Alto consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark, which means that by driving the Suzuki Alto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Alto consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway830 km on highway
640 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Suzuki Alto gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 12 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Agila, Suzuki SplashUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 3.50 m3.64 m
Width: 1.60 m1.60 m
Height: 1.47 m1.52 m
Suzuki Alto is 14 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Alto is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 129 litres170 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
774 litres873 litres
Chevrolet Spark has more luggage space.
Suzuki Alto has 41 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Spark. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Spark (by 99 litres).
Turning diameter: 9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Spark, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2501`355
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 28002800
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Alto has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Chevrolet Spark has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv