Suzuki Alto 2002 vs Suzuki Swift 2006

 
Suzuki Alto
2002 - 2006
Suzuki Swift
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.1 Petrol1.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 63 HP92 HP
Torque: 85 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.8 seconds12.8 seconds
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving.
Suzuki Alto engine produces 29 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Alto reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.96.3
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki Alto consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Suzuki Alto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Alto consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway880 km on highway
610 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 11 years19 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.50 m3.70 m
Width: 1.48 m1.69 m
Height: 1.46 m1.54 m
Suzuki Alto is smaller.
Suzuki Alto is 20 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data198 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data562 litres
Turning diameter: 9.2 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`485
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 10002400
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Alto has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Suzuki Swift has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv