Suzuki Alto 2002 vs Kia Picanto 2004

 
Suzuki Alto
2002 - 2006
Kia Picanto
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.1 Petrol1.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 63 HP62 HP
Torque: 85 NM86 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.8 seconds16.3 seconds
Suzuki Alto is more dynamic to drive.
Suzuki Alto engine produces 1 HP more power than Kia Picanto, but torque is 1 NM less than Kia Picanto. Thanks to more power Suzuki Alto reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km6.2 l/100km
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki Alto consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that by driving the Suzuki Alto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Alto consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway770 km on highway
610 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Alto engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years7 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Alto might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.50 m3.50 m
Width: 1.48 m1.60 m
Height: 1.46 m1.48 m
Suzuki Alto and Kia Picanto are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data220 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data882 litres
Turning diameter: 9.2 meters9.2 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`340
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Alto has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv