Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 58 HP | 55 HP | |
Torque: | 78 NM | 106 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
Suzuki Alto engine produces 3 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 28 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.9 | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Alto consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Alto could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
600 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.50 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.50 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 40 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`530 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |