Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Seat Arosa 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 78 NM | 86 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.4 seconds | |
| Suzuki Alto engine produces 8 HP more power than Seat Arosa, but torque is 8 NM less than Seat Arosa. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.8 | |
|
The Seat Arosa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Alto consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arosa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Alto could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Seat Arosa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Arosa, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Seat Arosa has
| |