Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 78 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Suzuki Alto engine produces 2 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.2 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Alto consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Alto could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Renault Clio has
| |