Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Nissan Micra 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 58 HP | 55 HP | |
Torque: | 78 NM | 79 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 19.7 seconds | |
Suzuki Alto engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan Micra, but torque is 1 NM less than Nissan Micra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.1 | |
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Alto consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Alto could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
600 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.50 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.50 m | 1.58 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 206 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 960 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Suzuki Alto can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`290 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |