Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Citroen C3 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 61 HP | |
| Torque: | 78 NM | 94 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
| Suzuki Alto engine produces 3 HP less power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Citroen C3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.0 | |
|
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Alto consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Alto could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 35 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen C3, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`483 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |