Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Suzuki Alto 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 63 HP | |
| Torque: | 78 NM | 85 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
| Suzuki Alto 2000 engine produces 5 HP less power than Suzuki Alto 2002, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Suzuki Alto 2002. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.9 | |
|
The Suzuki Alto 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Alto 2000 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Alto 2000 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Alto 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
| Suzuki Alto 2000 and Suzuki Alto 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto 2000 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto 2002, which means Suzuki Alto 2000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |