Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Seat Arosa 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 78 NM | 86 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.4 seconds | |
| Suzuki Alto engine produces 8 HP more power than Seat Arosa, but torque is 8 NM less than Seat Arosa. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.8 | |
|
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Alto consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arosa, which means that by driving the Suzuki Alto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Alto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Arosa, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
| |