Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Kia Picanto 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 62 HP | |
| Torque: | 78 NM | 86 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
| Suzuki Alto engine produces 4 HP less power than Kia Picanto, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Kia Picanto. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.1 | |
|
The Kia Picanto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Alto consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Alto could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
| Suzuki Alto and Kia Picanto are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 882 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Suzuki Alto can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Picanto has
| |