Suzuki Alto 1996 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 45 HP | |
| Torque: | 77 NM | 76 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 21.4 seconds | |
| Suzuki Alto engine produces 9 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.6 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Alto consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Alto could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 22 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 975 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 8.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |