Suzuki Alto 1996 vs Seat Arosa 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 54 HP | 50 HP | |
Torque: | 77 NM | 86 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.4 seconds | |
Suzuki Alto engine produces 4 HP more power than Seat Arosa, but torque is 9 NM less than Seat Arosa. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.8 | |
The Seat Arosa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Alto consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arosa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Alto could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
570 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
Seat Arosa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.50 m | 3.54 m | |
Width: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Arosa, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 130 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 790 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 8.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 1.2 metres less than that of the Seat Arosa, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`360 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Seat Arosa has
| |