Suzuki Alto 1996 vs Seat Arosa 1997

 
Suzuki Alto
1996 - 2000
Seat Arosa
1997 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 54 HP50 HP
Torque: 77 NM86 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.5 seconds17.4 seconds
Suzuki Alto is more dynamic to drive.
Suzuki Alto engine produces 4 HP more power than Seat Arosa, but torque is 9 NM less than Seat Arosa. Thanks to more power Suzuki Alto reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.8
Real fuel consumption: 5.8 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki Alto consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arosa, which means that by driving the Suzuki Alto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Alto consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arosa.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway740 km on highway
600 km with real consumption540 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.50 m3.54 m
Width: 1.50 m1.64 m
Height: 1.40 m1.46 m
Suzuki Alto is smaller.
Suzuki Alto is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Arosa, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data790 litres
Turning diameter: 8.6 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 1.2 metres less than that of the Seat Arosa, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`360
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Alto has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv