Suzuki Alto 1996 vs Nissan Micra 1998

 
Suzuki Alto
1996 - 2000
Nissan Micra
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 54 HP55 HP
Torque: 77 NM79 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.5 seconds16.4 seconds
Suzuki Alto engine produces 1 HP less power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Nissan Micra. Despite less power, Suzuki Alto reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.76.0
Real fuel consumption: 5.8 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki Alto consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Suzuki Alto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Alto consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway790 km on highway
600 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 24 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki IgnisUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Alto might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.50 m3.72 m
Width: 1.50 m1.58 m
Height: 1.40 m1.44 m
Suzuki Alto is smaller.
Suzuki Alto is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data206 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data960 litres
Turning diameter: 8.6 meters9.2 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`290
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Alto has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Nissan Micra has
  • timing chain engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv