Suzuki Alto 1996 vs Toyota Starlet 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 73 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Starlet is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Alto engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota Starlet, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Toyota Starlet. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Alto reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.8 | |
|
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Alto consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet, which means that by driving the Suzuki Alto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 24 cm shorter than the Toyota Starlet, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 8.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 1 metres less than that of the Toyota Starlet, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |