Suzuki Alto 2009 vs Suzuki Swift 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Suzuki Alto is available only with front wheel drive, while Suzuki Swift can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 70 - 102 HP | |
Torque: | 90 NM | 116 - 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 - 17 seconds | 10 - 14.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 5.2 | 4.6 - 6.5 | |
Suzuki Alto petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.50 m | 3.70 m | |
Width: | 1.60 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.51 m | |
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 20 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 129 litres | 213 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 562 litres | |
Suzuki Alto has 84 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Alto (by 212 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`250 | ~ 1`495 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 2800 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |