Suzuki Alto 2009 vs Toyota Aygo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 - 17 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 5.2 | 4.5 - 4.6 | |
|
Suzuki Alto petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Alto is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 129 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Suzuki Alto has 10 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. This could mean that the Suzuki Alto uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`250 | ~ 1`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |