Suzuki Alto 2009 vs Kia Picanto 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 69 - 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 NM | 94 - 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 - 17 seconds | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 5.2 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Suzuki Alto petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Suzuki Alto is 10 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Alto is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 129 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 605 litres | |
| Suzuki Alto has 71 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Alto (by 169 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.8 metres less than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`250 | ~ 1`335 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Picanto scores higher in safety tests. The Kia Picanto scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |