Suzuki Alto 2002 vs Kia Picanto 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Kia Picanto is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 63 HP | 62 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 85 NM | 86 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 - 17.5 seconds | 15.1 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 6.2 | 4.2 - 5.8 | |
|
Suzuki Alto petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.48 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Suzuki Alto and Kia Picanto are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 882 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`348 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |