Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Suzuki Alto 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 63 HP | |
| Torque: | 78 NM | 85 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.8 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 7.0 | 4.9 - 6.2 | |
|
Suzuki Alto 2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Alto 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
| Suzuki Alto 2000 and Suzuki Alto 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto 2000 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto 2002, which means Suzuki Alto 2000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |