Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Renault Clio 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Renault Clio is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 78 NM | 93 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 7.0 | 5.2 - 7.6 | |
|
Suzuki Alto petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`498 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Renault Clio has
| |