Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Kia Picanto 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 62 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 78 NM | 86 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.1 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 7.0 | 4.2 - 5.8 | |
|
Suzuki Alto petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
| Suzuki Alto and Kia Picanto are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 882 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Suzuki Alto can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`348 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |