Suzuki Alto 2000 vs Citroen C3 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Citroen C3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 78 NM | 94 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 7.0 | 4.4 - 7.2 | |
|
On average, the Suzuki Alto petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Citroen C3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 35 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 1.8 metres less than that of the Citroen C3, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`547 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |