Suzuki Alto 1996 vs Seat Arosa 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 50 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 73 - 77 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 10 - 17.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 7.2 | 4.3 - 7.6 | |
|
Suzuki Alto petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Arosa. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Arosa, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 8.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 1.5 metres less than that of the Seat Arosa, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`409 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Seat Arosa has
| |