Subaru XV 2021 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru XV engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mazda CX-30. Due to the lower power, Subaru XV reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru XV consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru XV could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru XV can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Subaru XV is larger. Subaru XV is 9 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru XV is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1406 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru XV uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru XV is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`070 kg | 2`070 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`554 kg | 1`471 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 516 kg | 599 kg | |
| Subaru XV load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Mazda CX-30. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru XV has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |