Subaru XV 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru XV) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Karoq) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. Subaru XV and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, but Subaru XV torque is 144 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Subaru XV reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru XV consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru XV could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru XV consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru XV can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Subaru XV is 8 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru XV is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru XV has 136 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Subaru XV uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 340 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru XV is 0.7 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Subaru XV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`128 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru XV scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Karoq is better rated in child safety tests. The Subaru XV scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru XV has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |