Subaru XV 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is a more dynamic driving. Subaru XV engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, but torque is 9 NM less than Renault Kadjar. Despite the higher power, Subaru XV reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru XV consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru XV could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru XV consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru XV can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Subaru Forester | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Renault Megane, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2015 1.2 engine: The Renault 1.2 TCe engine (H5FT) is a four-cylinder, fully aluminum turbocharged unit equipped with a 16-valve cylinder head without hydraulic lifters. It features direct fuel injection, a timing chain drive, variable valve timing on both camshafts, ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru XV is 2 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru XV has 87 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. This could mean that the Subaru XV uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 188 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru XV is 0.9 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Subaru XV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`853 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru XV scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Kadjar is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru XV has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |