Subaru XV 2012 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Subaru XV engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, but torque is 9 NM less than Renault Kadjar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru XV consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru XV could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru XV consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru XV can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
| Subaru XV and Renault Kadjar are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1270 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Subaru XV has 92 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 208 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru XV is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`903 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru XV is better rated in child safety tests. The Subaru XV scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru XV has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |