Subaru XV 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Subaru XV engine produces 3 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Subaru XV reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru XV consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru XV could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru XV consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru XV can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Subaru XV is larger, but lower. Subaru XV is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm wider, while the height of Subaru XV is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1270 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Subaru XV has 62 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. This could mean that the Subaru XV uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru XV (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru XV has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |