Subaru Levorg 2015 vs Volvo V60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Levorg engine produces 136 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Subaru Levorg reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.7 | |
| Subaru Levorg consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Levorg could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo V60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Volvo V60 2013 2.0 engine: Engines in this series are often associated with oil consumption issues, which many owners report over time.
In the initial production years, a common weakness was the coolant reservoir hose, which had a ... More about Volvo V60 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Subaru Levorg is 6 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1446 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Levorg has more luggage capacity. Subaru Levorg has 92 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Levorg is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Subaru Levorg can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Levorg has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |