Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007 vs Nissan Murano 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 255 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 334 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca engine produces 5 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Nissan Murano. Despite the higher power, Subaru B9 Tribeca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 10.6 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru B9 Tribeca could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is smaller. Subaru B9 Tribeca and Nissan Murano are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 402 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage space. Subaru B9 Tribeca has 167 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Murano. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |