Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007 vs Nissan Murano 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 256 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 334 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Nissan Murano. Despite the higher power, Subaru B9 Tribeca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 10.6 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru B9 Tribeca could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Murano, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 402 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru B9 Tribeca has 167 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Murano. This could mean that the Subaru B9 Tribeca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`257 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |