Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru B9 Tribeca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 297 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is more dynamic to drive. Subaru B9 Tribeca engine produces 75 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 76 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Subaru B9 Tribeca reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru B9 Tribeca could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.87 m | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Subaru B9 Tribeca has 235 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |