Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru B9 Tribeca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 297 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Subaru B9 Tribeca engine produces 27 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 213 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Subaru B9 Tribeca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru B9 Tribeca could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Outback, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is larger, but lower. Subaru B9 Tribeca is 11 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 1 cm wider, while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru B9 Tribeca has 528 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Subaru B9 Tribeca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru B9 Tribeca is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |