Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 396 HP | |
| Torque: | 297 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Subaru B9 Tribeca engine produces 151 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 263 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Subaru B9 Tribeca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 16.0 | |
|
The Subaru B9 Tribeca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Subaru B9 Tribeca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Outback, Subaru Legacy | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru B9 Tribeca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is smaller. Subaru B9 Tribeca is 9 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 535 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage space. Subaru B9 Tribeca has 85 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru B9 Tribeca is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |