Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 297 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is more dynamic to drive. Subaru B9 Tribeca engine produces 55 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 143 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Subaru B9 Tribeca reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru B9 Tribeca could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 530 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Subaru B9 Tribeca engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Outback, Subaru Legacy | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru B9 Tribeca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is 7 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru B9 Tribeca is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |