Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 297 NM | 248 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is more dynamic to drive. Subaru B9 Tribeca engine produces 56 HP more power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. Thanks to more power Subaru B9 Tribeca reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 14.4 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru B9 Tribeca is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru B9 Tribeca could require 255 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Santa FE engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Outback, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Magentis, Hyundai Grandeur | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is 18 cm longer than the Hyundai Santa FE, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 969 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1582 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru B9 Tribeca has 519 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. This could mean that the Subaru B9 Tribeca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru B9 Tribeca is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Subaru B9 Tribeca can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |