Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007 vs Subaru Forester 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Subaru Forester has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 147 - 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 198 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 6.5 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 6.3 - 10.5 | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is larger, but slightly lower. Subaru B9 Tribeca is 30 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 10 cm wider, while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru B9 Tribeca has 215 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. This could mean that the Subaru B9 Tribeca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`027 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |