Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007 vs Mazda CX-7 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-7 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-7 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-7 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 (petrol) | 2.2 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 163 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 205 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.2 - 11.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 7.5 - 11.5 | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-7. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is larger. Subaru B9 Tribeca is 17 cm longer than the Mazda CX-7, 1 cm wider, while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 774 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-7 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru B9 Tribeca has 220 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. This could mean that the Subaru B9 Tribeca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`273 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |