Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007 vs Mazda CX-7 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-7 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-7 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-7 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 (petrol) | 2.2 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda CX-7 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 163 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 205 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.2 - 11.3 seconds | |
| In general, Subaru B9 Tribeca are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda CX-7. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 7.5 - 11.5 | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-7. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is larger. Subaru B9 Tribeca is 17 cm longer than the Mazda CX-7, 1 cm wider, while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 774 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-7 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru B9 Tribeca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 2`273 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |