Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006 vs Subaru Forester 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Subaru Forester has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 147 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 297 NM | 196 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 6 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 6.3 - 11.0 | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is larger, but slightly lower. Subaru B9 Tribeca is 30 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 10 cm wider, while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru B9 Tribeca is 0.4 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Subaru B9 Tribeca can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`016 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |