Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Captiva has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Captiva can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Captiva also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 127 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 297 NM | 220 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 8.8 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 7.2 - 11.5 | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Captiva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is larger, but slightly lower. Subaru B9 Tribeca is 22 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 3 cm wider, while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 930 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Subaru B9 Tribeca has 15 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. This could mean that the Subaru B9 Tribeca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru B9 Tribeca is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Subaru B9 Tribeca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`454 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |