Smart ForFour 2014 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Smart ForFour is more dynamic to drive. Smart ForFour engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Up!, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Volkswagen Up!. Thanks to more power Smart ForFour reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Up! is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Smart ForFour consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Smart ForFour could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Smart ForFour consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 28 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 430 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Up! gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Up!) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Smart ForFour) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.49 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.50 m | |
| Smart ForFour is 11 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Up!, 2 cm wider, while the height of Smart ForFour is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Up! has more luggage space. Smart ForFour has 67 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.7 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Up!, which means Smart ForFour can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`330 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Up! is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Smart ForFour has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Up! has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Smart ForFour, so Smart ForFour quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForFour has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |