Smart ForFour 2014 vs Peugeot 108 2014

 
Smart ForFour
2014 - 2019
Peugeot 108
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 0.9 Petrol1.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 90 HP68 HP
Torque: 136 NM96 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds13 seconds
Smart ForFour is more dynamic to drive.
Smart ForFour engine produces 22 HP more power than Peugeot 108, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Peugeot 108. Thanks to more power Smart ForFour reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.23.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Peugeot 108 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Smart ForFour consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 108, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Smart ForFour could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Smart ForFour consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 108.
Fuel tank capacity: 28 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle920 km in combined cycle
770 km on highway1000 km on highway
430 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Peugeot 108 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 108) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Smart ForFour) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 13 years21 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan MicraInstalled on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 108 might be a better choice in this respect.
Peugeot 108 2014 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long.

Dimensions

Length: 3.49 m3.48 m
Width: 1.66 m1.65 m
Height: 1.55 m1.46 m
Smart ForFour is larger.
Smart ForFour is 2 cm longer than the Peugeot 108, 1 cm wider, while the height of Smart ForFour is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 184 litres196 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres780 litres
Despite its longer length, Smart ForFour has 12 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 108. This could mean that the Smart ForFour uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 195 litres).
Turning diameter: 8.7 meters9.6 meters
The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 0.9 metres less than that of the Peugeot 108, which means Smart ForFour can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4501`240
Safety:
Quality:
above average

below average
Smart ForFour has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 108 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Smart ForFour, so Smart ForFour quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 82006000
Pros and Cons: Smart ForFour has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Peugeot 108 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv