Smart ForFour 2014 vs Toyota Aygo 2014

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Smart ForFour
2014 - 2019
Toyota Aygo
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Smart ForFour is available with rear wheel drive, while Toyota Aygo can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 0.9 - 1.01.0

Performance

Power: 60 - 90 HP69 HP
Torque: 91 - 136 NM95 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 - 16.9 seconds14.3 - 15.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 4.73.8 - 4.2
Smart ForFour petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.49 m3.46 m
Width: 1.66 m1.62 m
Height: 1.55 m1.46 m
Smart ForFour is larger.
Smart ForFour is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Smart ForFour is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 185 litres168 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litresno data
Smart ForFour has 17 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo.
Turning diameter: 8.7 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 1.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Smart ForFour can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`419~ 1`240
Safety:
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 82008000
Pros and Cons: Smart ForFour has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Toyota Aygo has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv