Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 30 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Nissan Juke. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 46 litres | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 9 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |