Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Skoda Roomster 2006

 
Skoda Yeti
2009 - 2013
Skoda Roomster
2006 - 2010
Body: Crossover / SUVEstate car / wagon
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP105 HP
Torque: 350 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds11.5 seconds
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Yeti engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Skoda Roomster. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.4
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
920 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.20 m
Width: 1.79 m1.68 m
Height: 1.69 m1.61 m
Skoda Yeti is larger.
Skoda Yeti is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 11 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data450 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1780 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.5 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`770
Safety:
Quality:
above average

average
Skoda Yeti has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 66002200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Yeti has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Skoda Roomster has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv