Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Skoda Roomster. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
920 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 11 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1780 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`770 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |